Digital Permit-to-Work & Control of Work Software buyer guide
Review the wider capability model, products, evaluation criteria and procurement questions for this category.
Maintain auditable permit/work histories and provide dashboards, reports, trends, status views or performance analytics for hazardous-work control.
Recorded product facts are shown separately from buyer-specific recommendation scores. “Not yet verified” means evidence is incomplete; it does not mean the product lacks the capability.
| Product | Status | Confidence | Implementation | Evidence | Limitations / notes | Last verified |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EP EcoOnline Permit to Work EcoOnline | Supported | 99% | Not recorded | 1 source | EcoOnline provides permit tracking, Insights dashboards, live reporting and centralized documentation for audit and compliance visibility. | Sep 19, 2026 |
IP Intelex Permit to Work Intelex | Supported | 99% | Not recorded | 1 source | Intelex provides permit dashboards, visualizations, status views, reporting, platform audit trail and business intelligence. | Sep 19, 2026 |
SC Sphera Control of Work Sphera | Supported | 99% | Not recorded | 1 source | Permit to Work maintains permit/isolation/hazard histories and provides dashboards, reporting, compliance and audit-readiness visibility. | Sep 19, 2026 |
EC Enablon Control of Work Wolters Kluwer | Supported | 98% | Not recorded | 1 source | Enablon documents traceable risk/permit histories, operational visibility and management feedback across Control of Work. | Sep 19, 2026 |
JC j5 Control of Work Hexagon | Supported | 98% | Not recorded | 1 source | j5 provides dashboards, reports, views and digital workflows for permit status, operational visibility and auditability. | Sep 19, 2026 |
Use this capability as one requirement inside the wider category evidence model. The links below are research and comparison paths, not a product recommendation.
Review the wider capability model, products, evaluation criteria and procurement questions for this category.
Understand TechSelectAI coverage, source verification and research gaps before interpreting individual capability records.
See how support status, confidence, freshness and Unknown ≠ Unsupported are handled.
Supported, conditional, unknown and not-supported states are kept distinct so missing evidence is not treated as a negative fact.
Confidence reflects the strength of the recorded evidence for this capability, not overall product quality.
A product can strongly support this capability and still be a poor overall fit due to deployment, integrations, security, region, budget or other must-haves.
TechSelectAI can evaluate this capability together with your other must-haves, integrations, deployment constraints, security requirements, region and budget.
Evaluate software for my company