Digital Permit-to-Work & Control of Work Software buyer guide
Review the wider capability model, products, evaluation criteria and procurement questions for this category.
Execute permit, checklist, risk-control or field-verification steps on mobile or portable devices at the job site where explicitly documented.
Recorded product facts are shown separately from buyer-specific recommendation scores. “Not yet verified” means evidence is incomplete; it does not mean the product lacks the capability.
| Product | Status | Confidence | Implementation | Evidence | Limitations / notes | Last verified |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EC Enablon Control of Work Wolters Kluwer | Supported | 99% | Not recorded | 1 source | Enablon describes a fully mobile Control of Work experience for field execution of high-risk work. | Sep 19, 2026 |
SC Sphera Control of Work Sphera | Supported | 99% | Not recorded | 1 source | Sphera documents powerful mobile capabilities supporting Control of Work at the job site. | Sep 19, 2026 |
EP EcoOnline Permit to Work EcoOnline | Supported | 98% | Not recorded | 1 source | EcoOnline Control of Work provides frictionless mobile access for contractors and frontline participation in work-control processes. | Sep 19, 2026 |
JC j5 Control of Work Hexagon | Supported | 98% | Not recorded | 1 source | j5 Control of Work supports preparation and execution using desktop browsers and mobile computers; exact native mobile operating-system support is not inferred. | Sep 19, 2026 |
IP Intelex Permit to Work Intelex | Partially Supported | 97% | Not recorded | 1 source | The Intelex platform provides mobile and offline capability, but the reviewed Permit to Work page does not establish that every permit workflow/configuration is available identically offline. | Sep 19, 2026 |
Use this capability as one requirement inside the wider category evidence model. The links below are research and comparison paths, not a product recommendation.
Review the wider capability model, products, evaluation criteria and procurement questions for this category.
Understand TechSelectAI coverage, source verification and research gaps before interpreting individual capability records.
See how support status, confidence, freshness and Unknown ≠ Unsupported are handled.
Supported, conditional, unknown and not-supported states are kept distinct so missing evidence is not treated as a negative fact.
Confidence reflects the strength of the recorded evidence for this capability, not overall product quality.
A product can strongly support this capability and still be a poor overall fit due to deployment, integrations, security, region, budget or other must-haves.
TechSelectAI can evaluate this capability together with your other must-haves, integrations, deployment constraints, security requirements, region and budget.
Evaluate software for my company