Digital Permit-to-Work & Control of Work Software buyer guide
Review the wider capability model, products, evaluation criteria and procurement questions for this category.
Identify simultaneous or overlapping work, spatial/operational conflicts, incompatible permits or elevated combined risk before or during execution.
Recorded product facts are shown separately from buyer-specific recommendation scores. “Not yet verified” means evidence is incomplete; it does not mean the product lacks the capability.
| Product | Status | Confidence | Implementation | Evidence | Limitations / notes | Last verified |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EC Enablon Control of Work Wolters Kluwer | Supported | 99% | Not recorded | 1 source | Enablon explicitly provides real-time SIMOPS coordination and warnings for interacting hazardous activities. | Sep 19, 2026 |
SC Sphera Control of Work Sphera | Supported | 99% | Not recorded | 1 source | Sphera explicitly manages SIMOPS and detects work conflicts through real-time work and risk visibility. | Sep 19, 2026 |
IP Intelex Permit to Work Intelex | Partially Supported | 97% | Not recorded | 1 source | Intelex dashboards expose overlapping work in the same area, but automated SIMOPS incompatibility/risk-conflict logic is not inferred from the reviewed evidence. | Sep 19, 2026 |
EP EcoOnline Permit to Work EcoOnline | Partially Supported | 96% | Not recorded | 1 source | EcoOnline documents multi-permit visibility and guidance for flagging simultaneous-work conflicts, but a universal automated SIMOPS engine is not inferred from the core permit product. | Sep 19, 2026 |
JC j5 Control of Work Hexagon | Not Yet Verified | 0% | Not recorded | 0 sources | No limitation recorded. | Not recorded |
Use this capability as one requirement inside the wider category evidence model. The links below are research and comparison paths, not a product recommendation.
Review the wider capability model, products, evaluation criteria and procurement questions for this category.
Understand TechSelectAI coverage, source verification and research gaps before interpreting individual capability records.
See how support status, confidence, freshness and Unknown ≠ Unsupported are handled.
Supported, conditional, unknown and not-supported states are kept distinct so missing evidence is not treated as a negative fact.
Confidence reflects the strength of the recorded evidence for this capability, not overall product quality.
A product can strongly support this capability and still be a poor overall fit due to deployment, integrations, security, region, budget or other must-haves.
TechSelectAI can evaluate this capability together with your other must-haves, integrations, deployment constraints, security requirements, region and budget.
Evaluate software for my company