Enterprise Architecture & Application Portfolio Management buyer guide
Review the wider capability model, products, evaluation criteria and procurement questions for this category.
Home / Enterprise Architecture & Application Portfolio Management / Cost, risk & technical-health assessment
Enterprise Architecture & Application Portfolio Management · Application Portfolio & Governance
Cost, risk & technical-health assessment
Assess portfolio cost, business fit, technical health and risk.
5 products evaluated5 supported0 partial / conditional0 not yet verified0 not supportedAvg evidence confidence 97%Security-related capability
Product support comparison
Recorded product facts are shown separately from buyer-specific recommendation scores. “Not yet verified” means evidence is incomplete; it does not mean the product lacks the capability.
| Product | Status | Confidence | Implementation | Evidence | Limitations / notes | Last verified |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BH Bizzdesign Horizzon Bizzdesign | Supported | 99% | Not recorded | 1 source | Business fit, technical health, cost, value and risk are documented portfolio assessment dimensions. | Sep 14, 2026 |
A Ardoq Ardoq | Supported | 98% | Not recorded | 1 source | Ardoq documents application costs, optimization and business-risk analysis. | Sep 14, 2026 |
O OrbusInfinity Orbus Software | Supported | 98% | Not recorded | 1 source | Portfolio health, risk and investment data are explicit APM capabilities. | Sep 14, 2026 |
SA | Supported | 97% | Not recorded | 1 source | ServiceNow documents lower-cost, risk reduction and technology-risk informed portfolio decisions. | Sep 15, 2026 |
SL SAP LeanIX SAP | Supported | 95% | Not recorded | 1 source | LeanIX documents cost-saving, technical debt and risk-oriented portfolio decisions. | Sep 14, 2026 |
Buyer research paths
Use this capability as one requirement inside the wider category evidence model. The links below are research and comparison paths, not a product recommendation.
Software evidence benchmark
Understand TechSelectAI coverage, source verification and research gaps before interpreting individual capability records.
Evidence methodology
See how support status, confidence, freshness and Unknown ≠ Unsupported are handled.
How to use this comparison
Support status
Supported, conditional, unknown and not-supported states are kept distinct so missing evidence is not treated as a negative fact.
Confidence
Confidence reflects the strength of the recorded evidence for this capability, not overall product quality.
Fit for your company
A product can strongly support this capability and still be a poor overall fit due to deployment, integrations, security, region, budget or other must-haves.
Independent software advice
Need Cost, risk & technical-health assessment in your next system?
TechSelectAI can evaluate this capability together with your other must-haves, integrations, deployment constraints, security requirements, region and budget.
Evaluate software for my company