Mining Operations & Mine Planning Software buyer guide
Review the wider capability model, products, evaluation criteria and procurement questions for this category.
Schedule mining activities, tasks or work packages.
Recorded product facts are shown separately from buyer-specific recommendation scores. “Not yet verified” means evidence is incomplete; it does not mean the product lacks the capability.
| Product | Status | Confidence | Implementation | Evidence | Limitations / notes | Last verified |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DP Deswik Planning Deswik | Supported | 100% | Not recorded | 1 source | Deswik Planning explicitly integrates production, ancillary and project activities and can convert mine designs into schedulable tasks. This does not establish field execution or dispatch capability. | Sep 27, 2026 |
HM Hexagon MinePlan Hexagon | Partially Supported | 100% | Not recorded | 1 source | MinePlan Activity Scheduler is explicitly activity-based for named open-pit and underground packages. This is not universal MinePlan entitlement. | Sep 25, 2026 |
ME Maptek Evolution Maptek | Partially Supported | 99% | Not recorded | 1 source | Evolution Epoch manages multiple mining activities and tasks. Epoch is a named Evolution module and does not establish every package entitlement. | Sep 25, 2026 |
MV Maptek Vulcan Maptek | Partially Supported | 99% | Not recorded | 1 source | The Scheduling Suite Add-on explicitly supports resource and activity-based scheduling. This named add-on is not universal Vulcan entitlement. | Sep 25, 2026 |
DO Deswik OPS Deswik | Partially Supported | 99% | Not recorded | 1 source | OPS supports operator task progress and shift plans. The reviewed source does not establish every activity-based scheduling model or constraint type. | Sep 25, 2026 |
MO Micromine Origin Micromine | Not Yet Verified | 0% | Not recorded | 0 sources | No limitation recorded. | Not recorded |
RM RPM MinePlanner RPMGlobal | Not Yet Verified | 0% | Not recorded | 0 sources | No limitation recorded. | Not recorded |
Use this capability as one requirement inside the wider category evidence model. The links below are research and comparison paths, not a product recommendation.
Review the wider capability model, products, evaluation criteria and procurement questions for this category.
Understand TechSelectAI coverage, source verification and research gaps before interpreting individual capability records.
See how support status, confidence, freshness and Unknown ≠ Unsupported are handled.
Supported, conditional, unknown and not-supported states are kept distinct so missing evidence is not treated as a negative fact.
Confidence reflects the strength of the recorded evidence for this capability, not overall product quality.
A product can strongly support this capability and still be a poor overall fit due to deployment, integrations, security, region, budget or other must-haves.
TechSelectAI can evaluate this capability together with your other must-haves, integrations, deployment constraints, security requirements, region and budget.
Evaluate software for my company