Mining Operations & Mine Planning Software buyer guide
Review the wider capability model, products, evaluation criteria and procurement questions for this category.
Create or support long-range life-of-mine planning.
Recorded product facts are shown separately from buyer-specific recommendation scores. “Not yet verified” means evidence is incomplete; it does not mean the product lacks the capability.
| Product | Status | Confidence | Implementation | Evidence | Limitations / notes | Last verified |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DP Deswik Planning Deswik | Supported | 100% | Not recorded | 1 source | Deswik Planning is explicitly described as supporting long-range mine planning in a unified scheduling environment. This does not establish every strategic optimization method or reserve-reporting workflow. | Sep 25, 2026 |
ME Maptek Evolution Maptek | Supported | 100% | Not recorded | 1 source | Evolution explicitly produces strategic life-of-mine schedules alongside production plans. | Sep 25, 2026 |
HM Hexagon MinePlan Hexagon | Partially Supported | 100% | Not recorded | 1 source | MinePlan OP Engineering Strategic explicitly determines life-of-mine schedules. This named package is not universal MinePlan entitlement. | Sep 25, 2026 |
DO Deswik OPS Deswik | Not Yet Verified | 0% | Not recorded | 0 sources | No limitation recorded. | Not recorded |
MV Maptek Vulcan Maptek | Not Yet Verified | 0% | Not recorded | 0 sources | No limitation recorded. | Not recorded |
MO Micromine Origin Micromine | Not Yet Verified | 0% | Not recorded | 0 sources | No limitation recorded. | Not recorded |
RM RPM MinePlanner RPMGlobal | Not Yet Verified | 0% | Not recorded | 1 source | RPMGlobal explicitly documents strategic scheduling for MinePlanner, but the reviewed source does not directly establish the TechSelectAI life-of-mine planning criterion. | Sep 27, 2026 |
Use this capability as one requirement inside the wider category evidence model. The links below are research and comparison paths, not a product recommendation.
Review the wider capability model, products, evaluation criteria and procurement questions for this category.
Understand TechSelectAI coverage, source verification and research gaps before interpreting individual capability records.
See how support status, confidence, freshness and Unknown ≠ Unsupported are handled.
Supported, conditional, unknown and not-supported states are kept distinct so missing evidence is not treated as a negative fact.
Confidence reflects the strength of the recorded evidence for this capability, not overall product quality.
A product can strongly support this capability and still be a poor overall fit due to deployment, integrations, security, region, budget or other must-haves.
TechSelectAI can evaluate this capability together with your other must-haves, integrations, deployment constraints, security requirements, region and budget.
Evaluate software for my company