Terminal Operating Systems (TOS) buyer guide
Review the wider capability model, products, evaluation criteria and procurement questions for this category.
Calculate or support storage, handling, service, tariff and event-based terminal charges.
Recorded product facts are shown separately from buyer-specific recommendation scores. “Not yet verified” means evidence is incomplete; it does not mean the product lacks the capability.
| Product | Status | Confidence | Implementation | Evidence | Limitations / notes | Last verified |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NM Navis Mixed Cargo TOS Kaleris | Supported | 99% | Not recorded | 2 sources | The Mixed Cargo solution sheet documents granular billing by cargo type, subtype, handling type, revenue tons and board feet, plus value-added services, cash payments and proforma invoices. | Sep 19, 2026 |
TM Tideworks Mainsail Tideworks Technology | Supported | 99% | Not recorded | 1 source | Mainsail 10 billing explicitly applies rates and service agreements, creates charges from revenue-generating events, supports configurable invoicing, and Tideworks documents centralized management of billing contracts, rates and tariffs. | Sep 19, 2026 |
NN Navis N4 TOS Kaleris | Partially Supported | 97% | Not recorded | 1 source | N4 captures billable events and invoices and supports granular billable tasks, but the reviewed evidence does not establish universal storage/tariff configuration depth for every deployment. | Sep 19, 2026 |
RT RBS TOPS Expert Realtime Business Solutions | Partially Supported | 97% | Not recorded | 1 source | Billing is a named TOPS/TOPO special module, so billing capability is evidenced without inferring every storage/tariff/rating rule as universal base functionality. | Sep 19, 2026 |
CT CARGOES TOS+ (Zodiac) DP World | Partially Supported | 95% | Not recorded | 1 source | Billing and quick invoicing are explicit, but public evidence does not establish full storage, tariff and event-rating depth. | Sep 19, 2026 |
CO CyberLogitec OPUS Terminal CyberLogitec | Not Yet Verified | 0% | Not recorded | 0 sources | No limitation recorded. | Not recorded |
TS Total Soft Bank CATOS Total Soft Bank | Not Yet Verified | 0% | Not recorded | 0 sources | No limitation recorded. | Not recorded |
Use this capability as one requirement inside the wider category evidence model. The links below are research and comparison paths, not a product recommendation.
Review the wider capability model, products, evaluation criteria and procurement questions for this category.
Understand TechSelectAI coverage, source verification and research gaps before interpreting individual capability records.
See how support status, confidence, freshness and Unknown ≠ Unsupported are handled.
Connect this capability to specialist vessel, yard, gate, equipment, automation and integration research.
Create a private buyer workspace and import the specialist TOS criteria as unconfirmed requirements for review.
Supported, conditional, unknown and not-supported states are kept distinct so missing evidence is not treated as a negative fact.
Confidence reflects the strength of the recorded evidence for this capability, not overall product quality.
A product can strongly support this capability and still be a poor overall fit due to deployment, integrations, security, region, budget or other must-haves.
TechSelectAI can evaluate this capability together with your other must-haves, integrations, deployment constraints, security requirements, region and budget.
Evaluate software for my company