Terminal Operating Systems (TOS) buyer guide
Review the wider capability model, products, evaluation criteria and procurement questions for this category.
Plan and execute vessel calls, berth allocation, stowage or quay work using terminal-operational data.
Recorded product facts are shown separately from buyer-specific recommendation scores. “Not yet verified” means evidence is incomplete; it does not mean the product lacks the capability.
| Product | Status | Confidence | Implementation | Evidence | Limitations / notes | Last verified |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CO CyberLogitec OPUS Terminal CyberLogitec | Supported | 99% | Not recorded | 1 source | OPUS Terminal documents automated vessel, berth and yard planning using historical analysis, configurable patterns and real-time plan updates. | Sep 18, 2026 |
NN Navis N4 TOS Kaleris | Supported | 99% | Not recorded | 1 source | Kaleris documents vessel planning support including N4 Vessel Autostow and terminal planning across berth, yard and quay workflows. | Sep 18, 2026 |
RT RBS TOPS Expert Realtime Business Solutions | Supported | 99% | Not recorded | 1 source | TOPS Expert documents vessel planning/management, automated berth planning and real-time execution. | Sep 18, 2026 |
TS Total Soft Bank CATOS Total Soft Bank | Supported | 99% | Not recorded | 1 source | CATOS explicitly documents berth, ship and planning workflows including automated ship planning. | Sep 18, 2026 |
TM Tideworks Mainsail Tideworks Technology | Partially Supported | 95% | Not recorded | 1 source | Mainsail manages vessel activity, while full graphical vessel and berth planning is documented through the companion Spinnaker Planning Management System. | Sep 18, 2026 |
CT CARGOES TOS+ (Zodiac) DP World | Not Yet Verified | 0% | Not recorded | 0 sources | No limitation recorded. | Not recorded |
NM Navis Mixed Cargo TOS Kaleris | Not Yet Verified | 0% | Not recorded | 0 sources | No limitation recorded. | Not recorded |
Use this capability as one requirement inside the wider category evidence model. The links below are research and comparison paths, not a product recommendation.
Review the wider capability model, products, evaluation criteria and procurement questions for this category.
Understand TechSelectAI coverage, source verification and research gaps before interpreting individual capability records.
See how support status, confidence, freshness and Unknown ≠ Unsupported are handled.
Connect this capability to specialist vessel, yard, gate, equipment, automation and integration research.
Create a private buyer workspace and import the specialist TOS criteria as unconfirmed requirements for review.
Supported, conditional, unknown and not-supported states are kept distinct so missing evidence is not treated as a negative fact.
Confidence reflects the strength of the recorded evidence for this capability, not overall product quality.
A product can strongly support this capability and still be a poor overall fit due to deployment, integrations, security, region, budget or other must-haves.
TechSelectAI can evaluate this capability together with your other must-haves, integrations, deployment constraints, security requirements, region and budget.
Evaluate software for my company