Compare CARGOES TOS+ (Zodiac) vs Navis Mixed Cargo TOS for terminal operations across vessel, yard, gate, equipment, automation/integration, deployment, evidence coverage and known research gaps.
TechSelectAI compares CARGOES TOS+ (Zodiac) and Navis Mixed Cargo TOS using recorded product evidence rather than user-specific recommendation scoring. CARGOES TOS+ (Zodiac) currently has 5 supported, 25 conditional, 58 unknown/not-yet-verified, and 0 not-supported capabilities. Navis Mixed Cargo TOS currently has 10 supported, 12 conditional, 66 unknown/not-yet-verified, and 0 not-supported capabilities. Known-fact confidence is 97% for CARGOES TOS+ (Zodiac) and 98% for Navis Mixed Cargo TOS. Latest recorded review or verification activity across the comparison: Sep 19, 2026.
This summary reflects recorded TechSelectAI evidence only. It is separate from buyer-specific Fit Score, Evidence Confidence, TechSelectAI Verified Reviews and Public Review Intelligence. Unknown means not yet verified, not unsupported.
DP World-developed terminal operations suite, historically known as Zodiac, with OPS and optional suite modules spanning billing, auto gate, yard and equipment optimization, automation, RTLS and operational analytics.
Kaleris General Cargo / Navis Mixed Cargo TOS, formerly MTN / Master Terminal, for multipurpose terminals handling containers, breakbulk, dry and liquid bulk, project cargo, RoRo, vehicles and other mixed cargo across vessel, yard, gate, truck, rail and barge operations.
Different coverage percentages can reflect how much TechSelectAI has researched and verified, not which product is better. “Research pending” means the current evidence set is incomplete; it is not evidence that the product lacks the capability.
This summarizes the current evidence record by operational module. Known counts include supported and conditional facts. Pending counts are research gaps, not negative capability findings.
| TOS operational module | CARGOES TOS+ (Zodiac) | Navis Mixed Cargo TOS |
|---|---|---|
| Billing, Analytics & Operational Control | 5 / 9 known4 conditional · 4 research pending · 0 explicitly unsupported | 6 / 9 known3 conditional · 3 research pending · 0 explicitly unsupported |
| Equipment Dispatch & Automation | 8 / 10 known7 conditional · 2 research pending · 0 explicitly unsupported | 1 / 10 known1 conditional · 9 research pending · 0 explicitly unsupported |
| Gate, Truck & Landside Operations | 4 / 11 known4 conditional · 7 research pending · 0 explicitly unsupported | 2 / 11 known1 conditional · 9 research pending · 0 explicitly unsupported |
| Integration, Data & Ecosystem | 3 / 11 known2 conditional · 8 research pending · 0 explicitly unsupported | 1 / 11 known0 conditional · 10 research pending · 0 explicitly unsupported |
| Platform Architecture, Resilience & Security | 2 / 8 known0 conditional · 6 research pending · 0 explicitly unsupported | 4 / 8 known2 conditional · 4 research pending · 0 explicitly unsupported |
| Rail & Intermodal Operations | 1 / 7 known1 conditional · 6 research pending · 0 explicitly unsupported | 0 / 7 known0 conditional · 7 research pending · 0 explicitly unsupported |
| Reefer, DG & Special Cargo | 0 / 7 known0 conditional · 7 research pending · 0 explicitly unsupported | 1 / 7 known1 conditional · 6 research pending · 0 explicitly unsupported |
| Vessel & Berth Planning | 4 / 11 known4 conditional · 7 research pending · 0 explicitly unsupported | 3 / 11 known2 conditional · 8 research pending · 0 explicitly unsupported |
| Yard Strategy & Inventory | 3 / 11 known3 conditional · 8 research pending · 0 explicitly unsupported | 4 / 11 known2 conditional · 7 research pending · 0 explicitly unsupported |
The links below are the most recently checked verified sources in this comparison dataset. Source recency and confidence describe the research record; they do not establish a universal product ranking.
Status and confidence reflect recorded evidence. Unknown means not yet verified, not unsupported. In the summary above, TechSelectAI labels this state “research pending”.
| Capability | CARGOES TOS+ (Zodiac) | Navis Mixed Cargo TOS |
|---|---|---|
| Billing / tariff / financial integrationBilling, Analytics & Operational Control | Partially Supported96% confidenceThe CARGOES TOS+ PLUS portfolio lists Billing with user-defined quick invoicing; detailed tariff and finance integration scope is not inferred. | Supported99% confidenceKaleris documents capture of billable events, contracts and invoices with built-in billing options for Master Terminal. |
| Customer self-service portalBilling, Analytics & Operational Control | Not Yet Verified0% confidence | Partially Supported98% confidenceKaleris documents customer portals and an integrated web portal for communicating cargo availability, but the full transaction set available to external customers is not enumerated. |
| Operational audit historyBilling, Analytics & Operational Control | Not Yet Verified0% confidence | Partially Supported95% confidenceKaleris states that cargo movements are recorded in real time and supports track-and-trace visibility, but a complete immutable operational audit-history model is not separately established. |
| Operational visibility, analytics & KPIsBilling, Analytics & Operational Control | Partially Supported97% confidenceRTLS and FMS modules are documented with BI data analytics and OEE model support; module entitlement is not assumed in every TOS+ deployment. | Supported97% confidenceKaleris documents real-time cargo visibility and a digital interface for inventory and yard-utilization visibility. |
| Productivity & equipment KPIsBilling, Analytics & Operational Control | Partially Supported96% confidenceCARGOES TOS+ RTLS/FMS modules document BI data analytics and OEE model support; broader KPI coverage is not generalized. | Partially Supported96% confidenceKaleris customer evidence documents improved insight into daily performance and group-level performance consolidation, but a complete product-wide KPI catalogue is not established; the current product page labels operational dashboards as upcoming. |
| Shift / control-room dashboardBilling, Analytics & Operational Control | Not Yet Verified0% confidence | Not Yet Verified0% confidence |
| Simulation / what-if analysisBilling, Analytics & Operational Control | Supported99% confidenceDP World Southampton documents a simulation-modeling capability where terminal operations and planning results can be viewed in advance and fine-tuned before changes are made in production. | Not Yet Verified0% confidence |
| Storage, tariff & service billingBilling, Analytics & Operational Control | Partially Supported95% confidenceBilling and quick invoicing are explicit, but public evidence does not establish full storage, tariff and event-rating depth. | Supported99% confidenceThe Mixed Cargo solution sheet documents granular billing by cargo type, subtype, handling type, revenue tons and board feet, plus value-added services, cash payments and proforma invoices. |
| Volume / workload forecastingBilling, Analytics & Operational Control | Not Yet Verified0% confidence | Not Yet Verified0% confidence |
| AGV / ASC automated-equipment integrationEquipment Dispatch & Automation | Partially Supported97% confidenceYard Crane Automation explicitly integrates ARMG and ASC automation systems; AGV support is not inferred where it is not stated. | Not Yet Verified0% confidence |
| Equipment dispatch & controlEquipment Dispatch & Automation | Partially Supported98% confidenceSmart Dispatcher and Smart Yard Crane Scheduler provide dispatch and equipment-planning functions as named CARGOES TOS+ suite components rather than universal core-OPS entitlement. | Not Yet Verified0% confidence |
| Equipment position trackingEquipment Dispatch & Automation | Partially Supported97% confidenceRTLS is a named TOS+ component integrated with the TOS; exact positioning technologies and entitlement depend on implementation. | Not Yet Verified0% confidence |
| Equipment status & downtime awarenessEquipment Dispatch & Automation | Not Yet Verified0% confidence | Not Yet Verified0% confidence |
| Job pooling & dispatch optimizationEquipment Dispatch & Automation | Partially Supported99% confidenceSmart Dispatcher explicitly supports tractor pooling and travelling-distance setup, but it is a named suite component rather than universal base OPS entitlement. | Not Yet Verified0% confidence |
| Quay crane job executionEquipment Dispatch & Automation | Not Yet Verified0% confidence | Not Yet Verified0% confidence |
| RTG / RMG dispatch & work queuesEquipment Dispatch & Automation | Partially Supported96% confidenceSmart Yard Crane Scheduler provides auto yard planning and dynamic CHE zoning, but the public material does not establish identical RTG/RMG dispatch depth for every implementation. | Not Yet Verified0% confidence |
| Terminal automation / ECS integrationEquipment Dispatch & Automation | Supported99% confidenceDP World explicitly documents integration with real-time systems and terminal automation, including RTLS, ARMG/ASC automation and STS automation integrations. | Not Yet Verified0% confidence |
| Terminal tractor / straddle dispatchEquipment Dispatch & Automation | Partially Supported96% confidenceSmart Dispatcher explicitly includes tractor pooling and travel-distance setup; straddle-carrier support is not inferred from tractor evidence. | Not Yet Verified0% confidence |
| VMT mobile work instructionsEquipment Dispatch & Automation | Partially Supported98% confidenceDP World Limassol documents equipment operators switching to devices to receive operational instructions; VMT-specific device/platform behavior and universal base entitlement are not separately established. | Partially Supported98% confidenceKaleris documents work orders and task management together with mobile workforce tools and Mixed Cargo mobile applications; VMT-specific work-instruction behavior is not separately established. |
| Automated gate lane orchestrationGate, Truck & Landside Operations | Partially Supported97% confidenceAGS is explicitly described as an Auto Gate System in the CARGOES TOS+ suite; selected hardware and lane orchestration scope are implementation-dependent. | Not Yet Verified0% confidence |
| Driver identification & authorizationGate, Truck & Landside Operations | Partially Supported98% confidenceThe Batangas CARGOES AVA+ AGS deployment explicitly provides automatic driver identification, but this remains a companion gate-system capability integrated with TOS+. | Not Yet Verified0% confidence |
| Gate & truck operationsGate, Truck & Landside Operations | Partially Supported97% confidenceDP World lists AGS Auto Gate System within the CARGOES TOS+ suite; exact gate functions and lane-device scope depend on the selected suite configuration. | Not Yet Verified0% confidence |
| Gate customs / line / terminal holdsGate, Truck & Landside Operations | Not Yet Verified0% confidence | Not Yet Verified0% confidence |
| Gate OCR / ANPR integrationGate, Truck & Landside Operations | Partially Supported99% confidenceCARGOES AVA+ AGS at Batangas uses intelligent cameras to capture container numbers and truck license plates, but OCR/LPR capability is provided through the companion Auto Gate solution rather than assumed inside base TOS+ OPS. | Not Yet Verified0% confidence |
| Interchange / EIR processingGate, Truck & Landside Operations | Not Yet Verified0% confidence | Not Yet Verified0% confidence |
| Pre-gate & out-gate validationGate, Truck & Landside Operations | Not Yet Verified0% confidence | Not Yet Verified0% confidence |
| Truck appointment integrationGate, Truck & Landside Operations | Not Yet Verified0% confidence | Supported99% confidenceThe current General Cargo TOS page explicitly lists gate processing and appointment control within terminal execution. |
| Truck pre-advice & booking validationGate, Truck & Landside Operations | Not Yet Verified0% confidence | Not Yet Verified0% confidence |
| Truck turn-time & queue monitoringGate, Truck & Landside Operations | Not Yet Verified0% confidence | Not Yet Verified0% confidence |
| Weighbridge & VGM workflowsGate, Truck & Landside Operations | Not Yet Verified0% confidence | Partially Supported96% confidenceGeneral Cargo TOS explicitly supports weighing as a value-added task, but weighbridge integration and VGM workflows are not separately established. |
| Carrier booking & release integrationIntegration, Data & Ecosystem | Not Yet Verified0% confidence | Not Yet Verified0% confidence |
| CODECO / COARRI EDI messagingIntegration, Data & Ecosystem | Not Yet Verified0% confidence | Not Yet Verified0% confidence |
| COPARN / COPRAR EDI messagingIntegration, Data & Ecosystem | Not Yet Verified0% confidence | Not Yet Verified0% confidence |
| EDI, APIs & external-system integrationIntegration, Data & Ecosystem | Partially Supported94% confidenceDP World documents a robust integration environment for equipment automation and RTLS, but the reviewed public evidence does not enumerate a universal EDI/API catalogue. | Supported98% confidenceKaleris documents robust EDI integration for all major container-cargo EDI plus definable file formats for mixed cargo; API support is not separately inferred. |
| ERP / finance integrationIntegration, Data & Ecosystem | Not Yet Verified0% confidence | Not Yet Verified0% confidence |
| Event / webhook / streaming integrationIntegration, Data & Ecosystem | Not Yet Verified0% confidence | Not Yet Verified0% confidence |
| Gate / OCR subsystem integrationIntegration, Data & Ecosystem | Supported99% confidenceDP World states that CARGOES AVA+ AGS automatically transmits captured gate data to CARGOES TOS+ in real time for seamless processing. | Not Yet Verified0% confidence |
| MOVINS / BAPLIE vessel messagingIntegration, Data & Ecosystem | Not Yet Verified0% confidence | Not Yet Verified0% confidence |
| PCS / customs / authority integrationIntegration, Data & Ecosystem | Partially Supported96% confidenceDP World documents an ATI Batangas implementation connecting TOS, automated gate systems, customs functions and other CARGOES solutions; this proves a customs-connected implementation but not a universal PCS/customs connector catalogue. | Not Yet Verified0% confidence |
| Reefer monitoring system integrationIntegration, Data & Ecosystem | Not Yet Verified0% confidence | Not Yet Verified0% confidence |
| REST / web-service API integrationIntegration, Data & Ecosystem | Not Yet Verified0% confidence | Not Yet Verified0% confidence |
| Android mobile applicationMobile Access | Not Yet Verified0% confidence | Not Yet Verified0% confidence |
| iOS mobile applicationMobile Access | Not Yet Verified0% confidence | Not Yet Verified0% confidence |
| Mobile web accessMobile Access | Not Yet Verified0% confidence | Not Yet Verified0% confidence |
| BCP / degraded or offline operationsPlatform Architecture, Resilience & Security | Not Yet Verified0% confidence | Not Yet Verified0% confidence |
| Cloud / on-prem deployment flexibilityPlatform Architecture, Resilience & Security | Supported99% confidenceDP World explicitly states Cargoes P&T can be hosted on-site premises or in the cloud. This does not by itself classify the cloud option as public SaaS. | Not Yet Verified0% confidence |
| Disaster recovery & RPO/RTO controlsPlatform Architecture, Resilience & Security | Not Yet Verified0% confidence | Not Yet Verified0% confidence |
| High availability architecturePlatform Architecture, Resilience & Security | Not Yet Verified0% confidence | Partially Supported97% confidenceKaleris documents 99.9% availability under Navis Master Care for Master Terminal, but the reviewed public material does not describe the underlying high-availability architecture or topology. |
| Multi-terminal / multi-site operationPlatform Architecture, Resilience & Security | Not Yet Verified0% confidence | Supported99% confidenceKaleris documents a multi-terminal Master Terminal implementation for Euroports and states the global network will operate on one central system with group-level visibility. |
| RBAC / SSO / enterprise identityPlatform Architecture, Resilience & Security | Not Yet Verified0% confidence | Partially Supported99% confidenceThe current General Cargo TOS page explicitly lists Single Sign-On, but role-based access-control depth and supported identity-provider standards are not separately documented. |
| Security & administrative audit loggingPlatform Architecture, Resilience & Security | Not Yet Verified0% confidence | Not Yet Verified0% confidence |
| Throughput & scale for large terminalsPlatform Architecture, Resilience & Security | Supported99% confidenceDP World states the OPS planning and operations module is proven at marine terminals exceeding 10 million TEU per year. | Supported99% confidenceKaleris explicitly states Mixed Cargo TOS supports large cargo volumes and large numbers of internal and external users; Cuxport also describes the solution as scalable and configurable for any-sized terminal operation. |
| Rail / intermodal operationsRail & Intermodal Operations | Not Yet Verified0% confidence | Not Yet Verified0% confidence |
| Rail crane work queuesRail & Intermodal Operations | Not Yet Verified0% confidence | Not Yet Verified0% confidence |
| Rail interchange eventsRail & Intermodal Operations | Not Yet Verified0% confidence | Not Yet Verified0% confidence |
| Rail load / discharge planningRail & Intermodal Operations | Partially Supported95% confidenceThe Southampton implementation documents deadline handling for rail-yard moves, but full train/wagon load-discharge planning is not separately established. | Not Yet Verified0% confidence |
| Rail-yard inventory visibilityRail & Intermodal Operations | Not Yet Verified0% confidence | Not Yet Verified0% confidence |
| Train schedule & service managementRail & Intermodal Operations | Not Yet Verified0% confidence | Not Yet Verified0% confidence |
| Wagon / consist planningRail & Intermodal Operations | Not Yet Verified0% confidence | Not Yet Verified0% confidence |
| Container weight / VGM controlReefer, DG & Special Cargo | Not Yet Verified0% confidence | Not Yet Verified0% confidence |
| Damage & inspection workflowReefer, DG & Special Cargo | Not Yet Verified0% confidence | Not Yet Verified0% confidence |
| Dangerous-goods segregation controlsReefer, DG & Special Cargo | Not Yet Verified0% confidence | Not Yet Verified0% confidence |
| OOG & special-equipment handlingReefer, DG & Special Cargo | Not Yet Verified0% confidence | Not Yet Verified0% confidence |
| Reefer plug / unplug workflowReefer, DG & Special Cargo | Not Yet Verified0% confidence | Not Yet Verified0% confidence |
| Reefer temperature & alarm integrationReefer, DG & Special Cargo | Not Yet Verified0% confidence | Not Yet Verified0% confidence |
| Reefer, dangerous goods & special cargo controlsReefer, DG & Special Cargo | Not Yet Verified0% confidence | Partially Supported94% confidenceKaleris positions Master Terminal for containers, break-bulk, bulk, general cargo, RoRo, vehicles and logs; full reefer, dangerous-goods and OOG control is not inferred from cargo-type coverage alone. |
| BAPLIE import / exportVessel & Berth Planning | Not Yet Verified0% confidence | Not Yet Verified0% confidence |
| Berth window & berth allocation schedulingVessel & Berth Planning | Not Yet Verified0% confidence | Partially Supported96% confidenceKaleris General Cargo TOS explicitly supports berth resource allocation, but detailed berth-window scheduling, conflict handling and arrival/departure window logic are not separately documented. |
| Carrier vessel-plan collaborationVessel & Berth Planning | Not Yet Verified0% confidence | Not Yet Verified0% confidence |
| Discharge / load sequencingVessel & Berth Planning | Partially Supported97% confidenceThe Southampton implementation documents improved planning of discharge operations, but the public evidence does not establish a complete load/discharge sequencing engine across all deployments. | Not Yet Verified0% confidence |
| Quay crane split planningVessel & Berth Planning | Partially Supported98% confidenceDP World Southampton documents dynamic zoning of quay cranes to improve discharge planning, but exact crane-split algorithms and universal entitlement are not established. | Not Yet Verified0% confidence |
| Quay crane work queuesVessel & Berth Planning | Partially Supported99% confidenceSmart Stow explicitly provides automatic work-queue activation, but Smart Stow is a named CARGOES TOS+ suite component rather than assumed universal base OPS entitlement. | Not Yet Verified0% confidence |
| Restow & vessel rehandle planningVessel & Berth Planning | Not Yet Verified0% confidence | Not Yet Verified0% confidence |
| Stowage & bay planningVessel & Berth Planning | Not Yet Verified0% confidence | Partially Supported98% confidenceKaleris explicitly lists vessel planning and stowage coordination, but detailed container bay, hatch and deck stowage logic is not separately established for Mixed Cargo TOS. |
| Twin / tandem lift planningVessel & Berth Planning | Not Yet Verified0% confidence | Not Yet Verified0% confidence |
| Vessel & berth planning / executionVessel & Berth Planning | Not Yet Verified0% confidence | Not Yet Verified0% confidence |
| Vessel call lifecycle managementVessel & Berth Planning | Partially Supported96% confidenceDP World describes CARGOES TOS+ as providing real-time information on vessel, gate and yard movements, which establishes vessel-operational visibility but not the full vessel-call workflow, berth-window or stowage scope. | Supported99% confidenceKaleris explicitly lists vessel planning and execution across the General Cargo TOS operating scope. |
| Automated decking / grounding decisionsYard Strategy & Inventory | Not Yet Verified0% confidence | Not Yet Verified0% confidence |
| Block / stack allocation planningYard Strategy & Inventory | Not Yet Verified0% confidence | Not Yet Verified0% confidence |
| Configurable yard strategy rulesYard Strategy & Inventory | Not Yet Verified0% confidence | Partially Supported97% confidenceGeneral Cargo TOS documents yard and berth resource allocation plus cargo-specific handling workflows, but a universal automated yard-strategy/rules engine is not separately established. |
| Empty container inventory managementYard Strategy & Inventory | Partially Supported98% confidenceSmart Stow explicitly supports generic empty loading and Southampton documents empty-container selection, but broader empty-depot and inventory-control depth is not established for every deployment. | Not Yet Verified0% confidence |
| Housekeeping & remarshalling planningYard Strategy & Inventory | Partially Supported97% confidenceSmart Housekeeping is a named CARGOES TOS+ component for efficient yard-container management; it is not assumed as universal base OPS functionality. | Not Yet Verified0% confidence |
| Import / export / prestack segregationYard Strategy & Inventory | Not Yet Verified0% confidence | Not Yet Verified0% confidence |
| Rehandle minimizationYard Strategy & Inventory | Not Yet Verified0% confidence | Not Yet Verified0% confidence |
| Yard density & capacity visibilityYard Strategy & Inventory | Not Yet Verified0% confidence | Supported99% confidenceKaleris documents real-time cargo visibility into capacity and occupancy together with improved yard utilization for Mixed Cargo TOS. |
| Yard holds & exception managementYard Strategy & Inventory | Not Yet Verified0% confidence | Not Yet Verified0% confidence |
| Yard inventory reconciliationYard Strategy & Inventory | Not Yet Verified0% confidence | Partially Supported97% confidenceKaleris documents cargo and inventory management, real-time movement recording and yard/storage visibility; explicit planned-versus-physical reconciliation workflows are not separately documented. |
| Yard planning & container inventoryYard Strategy & Inventory | Partially Supported98% confidenceDP World documents Smart Housekeeping and Smart Yard Crane Scheduler within the broader CARGOES TOS+ suite; these named components are not assumed in every OPS configuration. | Supported98% confidenceKaleris documents real-time cargo movements, inventory visibility and improved yard utilization for Master Terminal / Navis Mixed Cargo TOS. |
| Deployment model | CARGOES TOS+ (Zodiac) | Navis Mixed Cargo TOS |
|---|---|---|
| On-premise | Supported99% confidence | Not recorded |
Comparison facts, TechSelectAI analysis, community-derived insights and estimates are kept as separate evidence types. Missing evidence is not treated as proof of non-support.
Adjust the context below. Context Fit is calculated from the same published TechSelectAI evaluation signals and scoring methodology; it does not replace verified product facts or the saved project Decision Matrix.
What could change this recommendation? Confirmed requirements, must-have failures, exact integrations, regional availability, pricing, security requirements, and implementation capacity can materially change fit. For a saved, reproducible decision with custom weights, use a Selection Project.
A feature comparison is not the same as a recommendation. TechSelectAI can evaluate both products against your must-have capabilities, integrations, deployment constraints, security requirements, region and budget.
Evaluate for my company